Maximum Assets Limit Upon Indian Politicians

Every Indian knows very well how rich our politicians the representatives and ministers are, nothing less than billionaires. Most of these representatives come from poor families. But when they declare their assets, theirs are into thousand crores.

People who are not into politics and do business, and people who are in various business related fields know it very well how difficult it is to earn good profits. There are losses, defaults, recessions, slow-downs and a lot of such things.

But, when our politicians who’re originally from poor families come into politics, become representatives and ministers they usually do one thing. They simultaneously start their own enterprises of tender (theka) based businesses. Their so called businesses are so well managed that all tenders (theka) goes to them, their businesses never face any slow-down, recession, market constraints etc. Their so called businesses manners mock our hardcore corporate world and business tycoons.

The thing is crystal clear, these businesses are just name sake pseudo-businesses to cover up, and the actual activities are scams. Else coming from a poor family, having desire for public service can never give thousand percent returns, especially if one was never into corporate world.

India’s problem in dealing with scams is that our very legislatures are full of these culprits, who would never bring an act which could counter scams. It is election time; we are encouraged to give votes. Indian voters should demand an act of following nature:

There should be an act which should profess maximum assets that could be held by representatives and ministers. Maximum amount of money in any form that could be held by public representatives and ministers should be declared, say, not more than two or five crores assets in any form.

Second provision for such an act should be the very moment assets of any public representative or minister crosses the upper limit of maximum assets that person must resign from the chair. In another blog I wrote about declaration of personal financial accounts by public representatives and ministers just like corporations are asked to do: 'Financial Accounting Be Mandatory For MPs, MLAs'. The above scenario would make our political systems non-lucrative; corrupt people would stay away from politics and people with genuine desire for public service would enter politics.

But our malice is that there are a lot of bastards in Indian politics who are unfortunately our legislators, they would never like to make politics non-lucrative. Yet, I would say public has that capability and power, and could start with demand for such legislations.

I would like to appeal Indian voters to never give their precious vote to a person who has disproportionate assets in their opinion.

Hindi me: Bhartiya Netao Par Adhiktam Sampatti Ki Sima

Bhartiya Netao Par Adhiktam Sampatti Ki Sima

Har Bharat wasi ye both acchi tarike se jaanta hai ke hamare neta, hamare jan partinidhi aur mantri kitne amir hote hae, abjopati karodopati. Hamare zyadatar jan pratinidhi to garib gharo se aate hae. Magar jab ye apni sampatti ghoshit karte hae to wo karodo abjo ki hoti hae.

Jo log rajniti me nahi hae aur vyapar karte hae, ya wo jo log vyapari shetr se kisi na kisi tariqe se jude hue hae, khub jante hae ke munafa kamana kitna mushkil hota hae. Nuksan hota hae, paisa dub jata hae, mandi aa jati hae, tangi aa jati hae aur musibate bhi hoti hae.

Lekin, jab hamare neta jo ke garib gharano se aaye hue hote hae, jab ye rajniti me aate hae, jan pratinidhi aur mantri bante hae, ye log ek kaam karte hae. Rajniti ke sath hi ye log apna niji vyausay bhi shuru kar dete hae, inke vyapar thekedari ka hota hae. Inka ye niji vyausay itna acha chalaya jata hae ke sare ke sare theke inko hi milne lagte hae, inke vyausay ko kabhi mandi, tangi ya aadi ka samna nahi karna padta hae. Inka vyausay hamare kattar vyapari aur karobari ko bhi nicha dikha deta hae.

Ek chiz to bilkul saaf hae, ye vyausay sirf naam ke liye hota hae, asli kaam to ghaple karna hota hae. Nahi to koi garib ghar se aane wala, jiske dil me jan seva basi ho kabhi itni kamayi dikha hi nahi sakta, hazar taka munafa, khas taur se tab jab ke inko vyapari duniya ka anubhau bhi na ho.

Ghaplo se nipatne me Bharat ki sabse badi samasya ye hae ke aese apradhi log hi hamare qanun banana ke liye baithe hue hae, jo kabhi aesa qanun nahi banayenge jisse ghaplo ko roka ja sake. Ye election ka samay hae; hume utsahit kiya jata hae ke hum vote de. Bharitya matdata ko aese qanun ki mang karni chahiye.

Ek aesa qanun hona chahiye jo niyojit kare ke ek jan pratinidhi ya mantri adhik se adhik kitni sampatti rakh sakta hae. Adhik se adhik daulat chahe wo kisi bhi roop me ho isko maryadit kar diya jana chahiye, jaese ke, kisi bhi roop me do ya panch crore se zyada sampatti nahi rakh sakta ho.

Aese qanun ka dusra praudhan ye hona chaiye ke jis bhi samay kisi bhi jan pratinidhi ya mantri ki sampatti adhiktam tay ki hui sampatti se zyada ho jaye tou usko fauran apne pad se istefa dena hoga. Mere ek dusre blog me maene netao ki niji sampatti ki accounting aur uski ghoshna badi companies ki tarha hi ho aesi baat kahi thi: 'Financial Accounting Be Mandatory for MPs, MLAs'. Aesi halat me hamari rajniti daulat ki nazro se akarshak nahi rah payegi; apradhi log rajiniti me ana band kar denge aur sirf wohi log rajniti me ayenge jike dilo ma jan seva ki sacchi bhavna hogi.

Lekin hamari musibat ye hae ke kayi sare haramzade Bhartiya rajniti me bhare pade hae, jo hamare qanun banne me hissa lete hae, ye kabhi nahi chahenge ke rajniti daulat kamane ki nazar se akarshit na reh jaye. Phir bhi, mae ye kahunga ke janta ke paas ye taqat hae, aur hum kam se kam aesi mang ke sath to is karya ki shuruwat kar sakte hae.

Mae Bharat ke matdata se vinti karta hu ke wo apna qimti mat aese logo ko na de jo inke vichar me aaye se adhik sampatti rakhte ho.

In English: Maximum Assets Limit Upon Indian Politicians

Bhartiya Sansad Aur Vidhan Sabhao me Naujawan

Agar hum Bhartiya Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhao ko dhyan se dekhe to hum ye keh sakte hae ke Bhartiya Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhaye buddho se bhari hui hae. Aesa lagta hae ke agar aap 75 warsh ke niche hae to aap Bhartiya Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhao me bachche hae. Ye ek dharna ban chuki hae ke pratinidhitwa aur mantripad sirf un logo ke liye hota hae jo 75 warsh ke upar hae.

Bharat ke Shasanik vibhag (Executive) me retirement 55-60 saal ki umr me hota hae, jiska matlab ye hae ke karmchari ki upyogita is umr ke baad khatm ho jati hae.  Ye bhi samajh liya jata hae ke karmchari bimariyo se bhi pareshan hoga, jiski waja se wo adhik upyogi nahi reh payega. Aesa koi qanun nahi hae, lekin yehi mana jata hae. Ek aur wajah ye bhi hoti hae ke naujawano ko bhi mauqa diya ja sake. Bhartiya Adalate bhi isi niyam par chalti hae.

Upar ke dono paragraphs ko amne samne rakha jaye to yehi pata chalta hae ke dono baate ek dusre ke bilkul ulat hae, ek taraf Bhartiya Nyayalay aur Executive aur dusri taraf Sansand aur Vidhan Sahaye. Isse ye sabit ho jata hae ke Bharat ke naujawano ka pratinidhitwa naujawan nahi kar rahe hae. Agar aurto ka pratinidhitwa sirf aurte hi kar sakti hae, dalito ka pratinidhitwa sirf dalit hi kar sakte hae, anglo-indian ka pratinidhitwa sirf anglo Indian hi kar sakte hae, fir, naujawano ka pratinodhitwa sattar assi saal ke log kyu karte hae, jinke saath inka umr me bhi boht antar hota hae?

Bharat ki Jansankhya ki banawat se tay hae ke Bharat ke adhiktar log naujawan hae, par kya naujawan log Bharat ke Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhao me apni jansankhya ke hisab se barabar dikhayi dete hae? Naujawan hi Bharat ka asal chehra hae, naye daur ke hisab se inke apni samasyaye hae. Naujawan hi badalte hue Bharat ki taswir hae. Naujawan biite hue kal aur aane wale kal ke bich ek pul ki tarha hae. Inki samasyaye inki soch inki raai sahi tariqe se naujawan hi samajh sakte hae.

Isi liye Bharat ke Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhao me Naujawano ko unki jansankhya ke hisab se nirwachit hone ka mauqa milna chahiye. Naujawano ki sankhya Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhao me badhayi jaaye aur sattar aur assi warsh se adhik aayu wale sansado ki sankhya kam ki jaaye. Bharat ka Sanvidhan Saansad hone ki umr kam se kam pacchis saal batata hae, Sanvidhan ko banane wale hamare rashtriya netao ne ek gatisheel gantantra ka sapna dekha tha, rudhiwaadi, bimar aur thake hue gantantra ka sapna nahi dekha tha!

Mae ye samajhta hu ke pratinidhitwa karna aur mantripad sambhalna both bada aur zimmedari wala kaam hae, jo ke aksar naujawan sahi tarike se nahi kar payenge kyuke inke paas shasan karne ka kattar anubhao nahi hota hae. Mae ye bhi samajhta hu ke sattar aur assi se adhik umar ke saansad diwar me jade hue stambh ki tarha hote hae jo diwar ko mazbuti dete hae, par aesi diwar ki kalpana karna jo sirf stambh se bani ho aur inte lagi hi na ho pagalpan hoga, both sari into ki zarurat padti hae stambho ke bich, Naujwan hi inte hoti hae!

Naujwano ke paas gatishilta aur akansha hoti hae, par videshi taqate inko apni chaalo me asaani se phansa sakti hae, ye hamare naujawan saansado ko Bharat ke khilaf hi shatranj ke mohro ki tarha istemal kar sakte hae. Isi waja se mae yehi kahunga ke sirf taiyyar kiye gaye naujawano ko jo shasan ki kattar padditi ko samajh sake inhi naujawano ko Bharat ke Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhao me nirwachit kiya jaaye, aese naujwano ko na bheja jaye jo jawani ke prabhao me sirf apni niji khwahisho ke liye hi jiite hae.

Isi liye, Mae chahta hu ke jo naujawan IAS ki pariksha paas kar chuke ho lekin IAS ke liye chune na gaye ho, aese logo ko chunao ke liye ticket diya jana chahiye, jo ke aage chal kar Sansad me Lok Sabha me baith sake. Isi tarha se pradesho ki civil services ki parikshao me jo paas ho chuke ho lekin chune na gaye ho in logo ko vidhan sabhao ke chunao ke liye ticket diye jane chahiye, sath hi aese hi logo ko Sansad ki Rajya Sabha me bheja jana chahiye. Is niti ko tab tak lagu rakha jaye jab tak ke hamara Sansad aur hamari Vidhan Sabhaye hamare desh aur pradesho ki jansankhya ki banawat ka ek chota sa magar sahi roop na ban jaye.

Mujhe ye bhi lagta hae, ke dusre aarakhshan bhi Sansad Aur Vidhan Sabhao me hone chahiye, jansankiya banawat ke hisab se (Nar-Naari), (Dehati-Shahri), (Prathmik, Madhyamik, Trutiya shreni ke mazdur), (Niryatak-Aayatak), (Doctorate dharak) aadi. Bhartiya Nirwachan aayog ko iska vishleshan karna chahiye ke kitni seato ko aarakshit kiya jaye doctoro, Engineero, wakilo, mazduro, shikshako, kisano, vaegyaniko, retired raksha/police/nyayala ke logo, machero, aayatak, niryatak, adivasi, (bachcho/jangalo/ janwaro/ pradushan aur anya vishayo) par kam karne wale samajik karya kartao, itihaskaro, vastukaro, khiladiyo (Olympic aur aadi medallist) ke liye.

Bharat dharm nirpeksh rashtra hae, is liye saral dharmik arakshan sahi nahi hoga, saath iske ghalat parinam honge, isi liye dusre kisi aur tariqe se dharmik banawat ke pratinidhitwa ko samyojit kiya jana chahiye.

Jab Bharat ka Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhaye hamari jansankhya ka chhota sa roop ban jayengi tab hum sahi dhang se ek kamiyab, sahi aur fal dene wale jantantra ko pa sakenge. Bharat ke Sansad me naujawano ka arakshan hi hamare sapne ki taraf ek niu ka patthar saabit hoga.

In English: Youths ln Indian Parliament And Assemblies

Time Bound Judiciary, India’s Need!

India has an independent judiciary with Supreme Court of India at its apex. Supreme Court of India is also responsible for interpreting the Constitution of India. Any law passed by the Parliament of India or by any state legislature can be considered unconstitutional if Supreme Court of India considers it going against the basic structure of Constitution of India, again, it is Supreme Court of India which decides what the basic structure of the Constitution of India is. Such is the power of our judiciary.

Indians look to judiciary as a solace against governments, many of which had taken unconstitutional stands from time to time; it was our judiciary which bought relief to us. Judiciary in India is responsible for dispensing justice to one and all against any injustice done to them.

But 120 crore Indians are well aware of the speed of judiciary in India, it in many cases had crossed the normal human life span, we can never call such a scenario as a proper judicial system. A person filing case against any wrong done to him, a person involved in relieving oneself from any accusation in which the person is not involved; people involved in numerous cases ranging from family matters to terrorism all have one thing in common, they have to wait, till when, we don’t know

Any judicial procedure which crosses normal human lifespan is meaningless. A person involved in any case which took 30 years, 25 years, 20 years, would we call it justice? A senior person aged 60 years, 70 years, 80 years would have to think whether to file a case which will take 20, 30 more years or better to accept any wrong done to him because normally that person is not left with 20, 30 more years to live, considering the normal human life span! 

We must at earliest, put a time boundary on all sections of any acts which are in continuity or which would come up in future. For example, all sections of Indian Penal Code should be consolidated with proper time frame; that is, say section 420 dealing with cheating be consolidated with maximum two years, 376 dealing with Rape be consolidated with maximum three years, 302 dealing with murder be consolidated with maximum five years and so on. Even, the same should be done with acts relating with inheritance, compensation rights, consumer rights etc.

Any law which doesn’t include time boundary in its sections and clause should be considered un-constitutional. Our Judicial machinery is three tier, lower courts then to High Courts and then finally to Supreme Court. The time frame talked about should cover all three phases; as an example, in five years even Supreme Court’s hearing for a case involving IPC section 302 be completed.

I appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India to ask the Parliament of India to legislate an act which proposes to bring all acts current and future ones to be consolidated with time frame in their various sections.

Please vote on the page to show you support the cause! 

In Hindi: Samay Simit Nyaay Pranaali, Bharat Ki Zarurat!

Part 1: India needs ‘Fast Track Judiciary’ and not ‘Fast Track Courts’

Samay Simit Nyaay Pranaali, Bharat Ki Zarurat!

Bharat ki nyaay pranaali ek swatantra nyaay parnaali hae, jiske uchyatam sthaan par Bharat ka Sarwochyam Nyaayaalay sthaapit hae. Bharat ke Swanwidhaan ki Vyakhya karne ki zimmedaari bhi Bharat ke Sarwochyam Nyaayaalay ke paas hi hae. Bharat me Sarwochyam Nyaayaalay ke paas Sansad ya kisi bhi Vidhan sabha dwaara banaye kisi bhi qaanun ko awaed ghoshit karne ka adhikar hae, yadi Sarwochyam nyaayaalay ose Bharat ke Sanwidhaan ke bunyadi dhaanche ke viprit maane, iske baad bhi, Bharat ke swanwidhaan ka bunyaadi dhaanche kya hae, isko bhi tay karne ka adhikaar Sarwochyam Nyaayaalay ka hi hae. Ye hae hamaare nyaay pranaali ki shakti.

Bharat ke logou ka wibhinn sarkaro ke khilaaf, jin sarkaaro ne kayi baar aswanvidhaanik kaary kiye the, aakhri samaadhan nyaay pranaali hi rahaa hae; hamare nyaay pranaali ne hi hamesha hume sharan di hae. Bharat ki nyaay pranaali ki zimmedaari hae ke har ek, jiske bhi saath ghalat hua ho ose nyaay de.

Lekin 120 crore Bhartiya achi tarha se jaan te hae ke Bharat me Nyaaytantra ki gati kitni dhimi hae, kayi baar tou iski dhimi gati saamanya manushyo ke jiwan kaal ko bhi paar kar jaati hae, is haalat ko hum sampurna nyaay pranaali tou nahi keh sakte hae naa! Ek vyakti khud ke saath hue anyaay ke khilaaf ek maamla daair karta hae, ek vyakti khud ko nirdosh saabit karne me laga hua hae us apraadh ke aaroop me jisme wo shaamil hi nahi tha; log uljhe huwe hae gharelou maamlou se lekar aatankwaad ke maamlou tak, sab hi ke maamlou me ek chiz tou samaan hae, wo ye ke unhe intezaar karna hae, kitna intezaar, koi nahi jaanta!

Koi bhi Nyaay pranaali jo manushya ke saamanya jiwan kaal ko hi paar kar jaaye bey maaine hokar reh jaata hae. Ek vyakti jo kisi maamle me uljha hua hae jisme 30 saal, 25 saal, 20 saal lag jaaye, kya hum ose nyaay keh sakte hae? Ek varisht naagrik jiski umar 60 saal, 70 saal, 80 saal ho kya wo soch sakta hae ke wo koi maamla nyaayaalay me daair kare, jisme agle 20, 30 saal lag jayenge, ose tou yahi lagega ke isse tou acha hi hoga ke wo anyaay seh kar khamosh baith jaaye kyuke uske paas nyaay ke liye ladne me lagne waale 20, 30 saal tou uske paas bache hi nahi hae!

Hume ise aapaatkaalin zarurat maan kar, jaldi se jaldi hamare saare vartaman qanuun ke saare niyam, adhiniyam, hisse, qalam ko samay sima baandhniya kar de, aur pravadhan kare taake bhavishya ke qaanun bhi samay sima bandhan ke saath banaaye jaaye. Udaahran ke taur par, Bhartiya Dandniya Samhita ko samay baadhniya banaa diya jaaye, dafa 420 jo dhoke baazi se judi hui hae os par 2 saal ki samay baadhyata laga di jaaye, dafa 376 jo balaatkaar se judi hae os par 3 saal ki samay baadhyata lagaayi jaaye, dafa 302 jo hatya se judi hae us par 5 saal ke samay baadhyata laga di jaaye. Aesaahi jaaidaad, muaawaza, upbhogta ke sambandhit adhikaaro ke qaanun me bhi samay baandhniyata jodi jaaye.

Koi bhi Qaanun jisme samay baandhniyata naa ho ose aswanwidhaanik maana jaaye. Hamari nyaay pranaali tiin shreni ki bani hui hae, nichli adaalate, uch nyaayaalay aur aakhir me sarwochyam nyaayaalay. Samay bandhniyata aesi ho ke in tino shreni se maamla guzarne me utna hi samay lage, udaahran, paanch saalo me 302 ke hatya ke maamle sarwochyam nyaayaalay tak pohoch kar pore ho jaaye.

Mae, Bharat ke Maananiya Sarwochyam Nyaayaalay se prarthna karta hu ke wo Sansad se kahe ke aesa pravidhan laaye jiske antargat Bharat ke saare vartaman qaanun aur bhavishya me laaye jaane wale qaanun samay sima bhaadhya banaye jaaye.

Krupya karke is page par apna mat dekar sahyog kariye.

Angrezi me: Time Bound Judiciary, India’s Need!

Part 1: Bharat ki zarurat ‘fast track nyaay’ hae naaki ‘fast track adalat’

Death Sentences should be abolished in India

In India, if anyone commits murder and if the person’s case is found to be rarest of rare case, then that person is given death sentence. On what basis the case is said to be rarest of rare case is ambiguous. On the basis of supplied evidences the judges decide the case to be rarest of rare.

Doesn’t humanity, our constitution and our conscience considers all humans equal? It is absurd if anyone kills other person in rarest of rare manner and rarest of rare circumstances then that person deserves death, implies, if anyone kills another person in normal manner under normal circumstances the accused will get only life sentence, are we trying to say that life taken under normal manner under normal circumstances are not so grievous as those taken under rare manner and circumstances?

Even after death sentence, there is provision for mercy plea, curative plea etc, wherein even after death being pronounced on two persons for killing in rarest of rare manner, one can get life and other will get death, this is absurd! A murderer’s health and old age comes as barrier to death sentence being carried out, implies if only a young person kills in rare manner that person deserves death while those who also kill in rare manner in old age don’t deserve death. Does being killed by women is less a loss than being killed by men? It is absurd that our law considers all such things.

In mercy petition too, when mercy petition is sole prerogative of just and just President, the president takes advises from ruling government, which is definitely a political party with a vote bank politics, it will definitely ask death for its opponents of anyone guilty, why do we involve political party in death sentences’ mercy plea, I know its government but that is very much made up of political party?

India, with its political scenario should abolish death sentence. Many countries with abolished death sentences have lesser murder rates. In India many a time people kill because of injustice been done to them, as manipulating evidences is quiet easy and widespread in India, justice is very slow. Also, deterrent theory is a folly, it is making a scapegoat of someone to prevent others from crime this theory is archaic.

We should rather lubricate our judicial procedure, takes steps against bribery, stop communalism by political parties, improve judicial systems; safeguard religious, cultural identities of one and all, stop imposition of particular religion, culture and language of non ardent, makes filing of FIRs and Cases easier; and abolish death sentence and uphold life imprisonment.

Political parties and media in India has become sadist they enjoy death sentences they publish how painful is death, what is weight of hanging ropes, how a hangman pulls the lever and so on to either consolidate vote bank or get cheap TRPs. 

In Hindi: Bharat me mrityudand ko khatm kiya jaaye  

Bharat me mrityudand ko khatm kiya jaaye

Bharat me, yadi koi vyakti kisi dusre vyakti ki hatya karta hae, aur atyant asaadhaaran paristhiti me karta hae tou ose mrityudand diya jaata hae. Atyant asaadharan sthiti ka pata kaese chale ga ye baat abhi tak aspasht hae. Sabuto ke aadhar par nyaydhish tay karte hae ke asaadhaaran sthti thi ya nahi.

Kya Maanauta, hamara sanvidhan aur hamari buddhi har manushya ko samaan nahi maanti? Ye badi betuki baat ho jati hae ke agar koi vyakti kisi dusre ko atyant asaadhaaran paristhiti me maare tou ose marityudand milega, iska matlab, ke agar koi kisi ko saadhaaran paristhiti me maare to ose aajivan kaarawaas milega. kya hum ye kehna nahi chah rahe hae ke saamaan paristhiti me kisi ka jivan khatam kar dena utna bura nahi hota jitna ke asaadhaaran parsithiti me khatam karna hota hae?

Mrityudand ke baad bhi, hamaare yeha daya yaachika, rog niwarak yaachika ka paravidhaan hae, jisme yadi do vyaktiyou ne atyant asaadhaaran paristhitio me hatyaaye ki bhi hae, tab bhi, ek ko aajivan kaaraawaas mil sakta hae parantu dusre ka mrityudand badla nahi jaata, ye betuki baat nahi hae? Hatyaare ka swaasth uski badhti hui umar uske mrityudand ke aade aati hae, iska matlab agar koi yuwa kisi ki atyant asaadharan sthti me hatya kare tou ose mrityudand milna aawashyak hae parantu koi budhha hatya kare to ose mrityudand nahi hona chaahiye. Kya naari ke hatho mrityu ho jaana chhoti si baat hae aur mard ke hatho mrityu ho jaana badi baat hae? kitni betuki baat hae ke hamara qanun ye sab dekhta hae.

Daya yaachika me bhi, yadi daya yachika sirf aur sirf Rashtrapati ka kaam hota hae, to usme fir rastrapati sarkaar se ray kyu lete hae? Sarkaar ant me tou ek raajinitik dal hi hota hae jiski ek apni vote bank hoti hae, fir tou sarkaar apne raajnitik virodhi doshi ke liye mrityudand ka hi sujhaao karegi na. Hum raajnitik dalou ko daya yaachika me kyu shaamil karte hae? Mae jaanta hu ke wo Sarkaar hae, rajnitik dal nahi, par sarkaare raajtik dalou se hi banti hae.

Bharat me iske raajnitik parik-vashya ko dekhte hue yeha se mrityudand khatam kar dena chaahiye. Boht saare deshou me mrityudand ko khatm hi kar diya gaya hae, aur waha jaghanya apraadho ke aakde bhi Bharat se kam hae. Bharat me aksar tou log is liye bhi hatya karte hae kyuke unke saath anyaay hua hota hae, sabuto aur gawaaho ke saath ched chaad Bharat me ek aam baat hae, nyaay atyant dhimagati se praapt hota hae. Kisi ko dand dena taake dusre dar kar apraadh naa kare ye ek betuki baat hae, ye tou kisi ek vyakti ko is liye bali ka barka bana dena hae taake dusre apraadh na kare, ye sab soch puraani mansikta hae.

Hume iske ulat, hamare desh ki nyaay pranaali ko tez karna hoga, hume rishwatkhori ke khilaaf qadam uthaane honge, hume raajnitik dalo dwara sampradaayikta ko khtam karna hoga; hume alp-sankhyak dharm aur sanskruti ki raksha karni hogi. Kisi par bhi kisi dusre dharm, sanskruti ya bhaasha ko thopne se bachna hoga, police shikayat aur nyaay yaachika ko saral banana hoga; aur mrityudand ko khatm karke aajivan kaarawaas ka pravadhan lana hoga. Bharat ke raajnitik dal aur media atyant hi sadist (pidan kaamuk/ kisi ki pida se adand uthana) ho chuki hae, mrityudand se inhe kitne aanand ka aabhaas hone laga hae, we kya kya prakaashit karte hae, ke mrityu kaese hoti hae, rassio ka bhaar kitna hota hae, jallaad faansi kaese deta hae ityaadi, sirf is liye taake vote bank ki raajniti ki jaa sake ya sasti TRP praapt ki jaa sake.

Angrezi me: Death Sentences should be abolished in India  

Sincere Homage: Dr APJ Abdul Kalam

I pay my sincere homage to the People's President, former President of the Republic of India, a scientist, a teacher, an innovator and a man with great visions for India and the World. Who knows when will India get its next Dr. Kalam, till then, he's left a vacant place. You'll be remembered all the time. RIP Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam. Inna Lillahe Wa Inna Ilaehe Raajiuun!

Meri Shradhaanjali Logou ke Rashtrapati ko, Bharat Ganrajya ke bhuutpurwa Rashtrapati, ek vaigyanik, ek shikhshak, nau nirman kari, ek vyakti jinke paas badi mahatwa kanshaye thi Bharat aur Dunya ke liye. Na jane ab Bharat ko kab uska dusra Dr Kalam milega, us samay tak unki jaga khali hi rahegi. Aap har baar yaad kiye jaoge, Dr APJ Abdul Kalam. Inna Lillahe Wa Inna Ilaehe Raajiuun!