Make bribery a Non-bailable offense in India!

Topic 31:


All Indians are well aware of corruption and bribery to government officials (Babu). India, since independence has suffered on every front because of this bribery (chai-pani) custom. No matter which party you name they shout slogans about anti-corruption but the fact is that let it be any party which is in power has done little or nothing for this bribery system. We Indians once a while start activism for this and few days later we forget everything and start to relive in corrupt system.

I sincerely appeal to all governments from centre to all states and all corporations etc to bring in or either work on bringing a national law or states’ laws in latter’s case with just minor differences from one to another states’, against bribery and corruption. And the most prominent clause of such an act should be that Bribery should be made into a Non-Bailable offence. The burden of proof should be put on the government official accused in this. The punishment should be severe up to 14 years rigorous imprisonment. 

All Indians and our legal bodies, right from Panchayat to parliament up to Hon. Supreme Court know this fact that somewhere and somehow common person has got no option but to give bribe. This may be an international problem but we, at least we, are responsible for our country: India. We can’t wait for an international accord on this issue, that too when, when there are countries with far lower corruption rate and thus least interested in this issue per say.

Corruption and bribery are such strictly followed in governmental agencies as if it is part of enshrined goals as stated in preamble to the constitution that is like: we the people of India having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a corrupt state or more like a fundamental duty! Shouting slogans, distributing zero notes will not end corruption, we all know this and we are just being sympathetic with our own dilemma.

On one hand government officials keep on getting increments and facilities and on other hand they more dearly follow the custom of demanding bribes. In India things like passports, election cards, ration cards, driving license, electric supply, water supply, factory license, birth certificate, death certificate, complaints at police stations, getting clarification certificates from government officials and what not, all these need bribe, your legal or fundamental rights go into dustbin, if you have bribe money you can get your work done else you are not even considered Indian citizen rather are seen as spy of an enemy nation.

Merely, suspension of officers and later lethargy of judicial procedure would never end corruption and thus plight of Indian citizens. I appeal to all ruling government in the interest of India, the central government, all the state governments and other local bodies to draft such bills and put those in houses. I also appeal to all oppositions in all houses to whole heartedly support such a bill.

When a citizen goes for some work to a government official it is his right to approach that government official, and what he demands (certificate, card etc) is his right to acquire. Thus when it is our right to acquire something nobody would want to pay for it except of legal fees. Why we give bribe is because we are not getting our rightful stuff, thus we pay bribe. Official on other hand demand bribe to provide that very stuff or to provide unlawful stuff, in first case the common citizen is forced. Just taking the first situation we should consider citizen as under compulsion and thus let him walk free of crime, no burden of crime should be put on him.

As for the second situation where a culprit tries to give bribe to government official to acquire some unlawful stuff then to Non-Bailable clause with severe rigorous imprisonment should apply only to government official because it’s his duty not to let crime happen. This does not mean that those who give bribe to acquire should walk free but should be dealt according to current laws. But anyhow a common citizen who is forced to give bribe to acquire a lawful stuff should walk free without any burden. 

In Hindi: Bharat me rishwatkhori ko ghair zamanati jurm banaya jaaye!

Bharat me rishwatkhori ko ghair zamanati jurm banaya jaaye

Topic 30:


Saare Bhartiya bhrashtachar aur sarkari babuo ki rishwat khori ko achi tarike se jaante hae. Bharat azadi ke baad se hi is rishwatkhori aur chai pani chalan ki wajaa se boht nuqsan uthata aaya hae. Har rajnitig party chahe wo koi bhi wo bhrashtachar ke khilaf bade bade naare lagati hae lekin koi bhi party ho jab wo satta me baith jati hai is bhrashtachar ke khilaf koi qadam nahi uthati, naam ke liye thoda idhar udhar kar deti hae. Hum Bharatiya log bhi ek samay to pore josh se bhrashtachar ke khilaf maidan me utar te hae, fir thode samay baad sab kuch bhul kar apne gharou ko laut jate hae, dobara usi bhrashtachar ki duniya me.

Mae har sarkar, Kendra ki sarkar se lekar har rajya ki sarkar, har nagar nigamo se anurodh karta hu is bhrashtachar ke khilaf ya tou kendriya qanun ya tou rashtriya qanun banaye (ek rashtra ka qanun dusre rashtra ke qanun me mamuli sa hi antar ho). Is qanun ka sabse mukhya pravadhan ye ho ke rishwat khori ek ghair zamanati jurm bana diya jaye. Aur khud ko nirdosh sabit karne ki zimmedari bhi isme fase huwe sarkari afsar ki hi ho. Iski saza bhi kathin rakhi jaye lag bhag chauda saal tak qaid ba mushakkat. 

Har Bhartiya, hamari saari vidhayika, Panchayat se lekar Sansad tak aur Mananiya Uchyatam Nayayalay ko bhi ye baat pata hae ke kahi na kahi aam admi rishwat dene ko majbur kiya jaata hae. bhale hi ye samasya antarrashtriya samasya ho, lekin kam se kam apne desh ki zimmedari sirf aur sirf hamari hae. Hum kisi antarrashtriya pehel ka intezaar nahi kar sakte, wo bhi tab jab ke kayi sare desho me rishwat khori naa ke barabar hae to wo is maamle me dilchaspi kyu lenge.

Bhrashtachar aur rishwatkhori ka sarkari afsar is tarike se paalan karte hae ke jaise ye hamare samwidhan me adarsh ho, jaise ke: Hum Bharat ke log Bharat ko ek Brhastacharwaadi desh banana chahte hae, shayad aesa kuch, aese palan kiya jata hae ke kahi bhrashtachar hamare desh me buniyadi zimmedari tou nahi hae! Naare lagane se , shunya ki note baantne se kuch nahi hone wala, ye sab to sirf apne aap ko jhuti tasalli dena hae.

Ek taraf to sarkari afsaro ka wetan aur labh har saal badhaya jaate hae, aur dusri taraf unki rishwatkhori bhi utni hi tezi se badhti chali jati hae. Bharat me passport, election card, ration card, driving license, bijli sewa, pani sewa, karkhano ke license, janam patr, mrityu patr, police me shikayat, koi sarkari anumati aur kya nahi ye sab pane ke liye rishwat zaruri ho gayi hae. Apka Bhartiya hona, apka buniyadi haq, ye sab baato ko kachre ke dibbe me daal diya jaate hai. Agar apke paas rishwat dene ko paise hae to apka kaam ho jayega, warna aap ko kisi dushman rashtra ka jasus samjha jayega.

Sirf kuch afsaro ko nishkashit kar dene se aur uske baad dhimi gati ki nyay pranali me mamla chale jane se desh ka bhrashtachar nahi ruke ga, aur naahi rukegi Bharat ke logo ki pidha. Mae sari sarkarou se anurodh karta hu ke Bharat ke khatir, kendriya sarkar, aur sari rajya sarkare, aur sare nagar nigam aese bill sansad, vidhan shabaou aadi me laaye. Aur mae sare ke sare kendriay aur rajyo ke vipaksh se bhi anurodh karta hu ke aese bill ko pore dil se apna paksh de.

Jab koi Bharatiya kisi sarkari afsar ke paas koi kaam lekar jata hae to wo uska haq hae, aur jab koi chiz hamara haq ho to uske liye (sarkari fees chhod kar) paise kyu de? Hum rishwat kyu dete hae, kyuki hamare qanuni kaam nahi bante. Sarkari afsar yehi qanuni kaam karne ki rishwat lete hae ya to fir kisi ghair qanuni kaam ki rishwat lete hae, pehle wale mamle me to ek aam admi majbur hae rishwat dene ke liye. Isi ko maan kar hume rishwat dene wale admi ko chhod dena chahiye kyuke ose majbur kiya gaya hota hae aur uspar koi jawabdari nahi honi chahiye.

Aur jo dusra mamla hae jaha koi ghair qanuni kaamo ke liye rishwat deta hae tab bhi ghair zamanati arop aur ba mashakkat qaid ka prawadhan sirf sarkari afsar ke liye hi hona chahiye, kyuke wo uski hi zimmedari hae ke ghair qanuni kaam na hone de. Iska ye matlab nahi hae wo wyakti jog hair qanuni kaam karwane aaya tha ose yuhi chhod dena chahiye balke ose bhi maujuda laagu qanuno ke tehat mujrim banana chahiye. Magar kisi bhi haal me ek aam admi jisko rishwat dene ke liye majbur kiya gaya ho ose beghair kisi aarop ke chhod dena chahiye.


Angrezi me:  Make bribery a Non-bailable offense in India!

Maximum Assets Limit Upon Indian Politicians

Every Indian knows very well how rich our politicians the representatives and ministers are, nothing less than billionaires. Most of these representatives come from poor families. But when they declare their assets, theirs are into thousand crores.

People who are not into politics and do business, and people who are in various business related fields know it very well how difficult it is to earn good profits. There are losses, defaults, recessions, slow-downs and a lot of such things.

But, when our politicians who’re originally from poor families come into politics, become representatives and ministers they usually do one thing. They simultaneously start their own enterprises of tender (theka) based businesses. Their so called businesses are so well managed that all tenders (theka) goes to them, their businesses never face any slow-down, recession, market constraints etc. Their so called businesses manners mock our hardcore corporate world and business tycoons.

The thing is crystal clear, these businesses are just name sake pseudo-businesses to cover up, and the actual activities are scams. Else coming from a poor family, having desire for public service can never give thousand percent returns, especially if one was never into corporate world.

India’s problem in dealing with scams is that our very legislatures are full of these culprits, who would never bring an act which could counter scams. It is election time; we are encouraged to give votes. Indian voters should demand an act of following nature:

There should be an act which should profess maximum assets that could be held by representatives and ministers. Maximum amount of money in any form that could be held by public representatives and ministers should be declared, say, not more than two or five crores assets in any form.

Second provision for such an act should be the very moment assets of any public representative or minister crosses the upper limit of maximum assets that person must resign from the chair. In another blog I wrote about declaration of personal financial accounts by public representatives and ministers just like corporations are asked to do: 'Financial Accounting Be Mandatory For MPs, MLAs'. The above scenario would make our political systems non-lucrative; corrupt people would stay away from politics and people with genuine desire for public service would enter politics.

But our malice is that there are a lot of bastards in Indian politics who are unfortunately our legislators, they would never like to make politics non-lucrative. Yet, I would say public has that capability and power, and could start with demand for such legislations.

I would like to appeal Indian voters to never give their precious vote to a person who has disproportionate assets in their opinion.

Hindi me: Bhartiya Netao Par Adhiktam Sampatti Ki Sima

Bhartiya Netao Par Adhiktam Sampatti Ki Sima

Har Bharat wasi ye both acchi tarike se jaanta hai ke hamare neta, hamare jan partinidhi aur mantri kitne amir hote hae, abjopati karodopati. Hamare zyadatar jan pratinidhi to garib gharo se aate hae. Magar jab ye apni sampatti ghoshit karte hae to wo karodo abjo ki hoti hae.

Jo log rajniti me nahi hae aur vyapar karte hae, ya wo jo log vyapari shetr se kisi na kisi tariqe se jude hue hae, khub jante hae ke munafa kamana kitna mushkil hota hae. Nuksan hota hae, paisa dub jata hae, mandi aa jati hae, tangi aa jati hae aur musibate bhi hoti hae.

Lekin, jab hamare neta jo ke garib gharano se aaye hue hote hae, jab ye rajniti me aate hae, jan pratinidhi aur mantri bante hae, ye log ek kaam karte hae. Rajniti ke sath hi ye log apna niji vyausay bhi shuru kar dete hae, inke vyapar thekedari ka hota hae. Inka ye niji vyausay itna acha chalaya jata hae ke sare ke sare theke inko hi milne lagte hae, inke vyausay ko kabhi mandi, tangi ya aadi ka samna nahi karna padta hae. Inka vyausay hamare kattar vyapari aur karobari ko bhi nicha dikha deta hae.

Ek chiz to bilkul saaf hae, ye vyausay sirf naam ke liye hota hae, asli kaam to ghaple karna hota hae. Nahi to koi garib ghar se aane wala, jiske dil me jan seva basi ho kabhi itni kamayi dikha hi nahi sakta, hazar taka munafa, khas taur se tab jab ke inko vyapari duniya ka anubhau bhi na ho.

Ghaplo se nipatne me Bharat ki sabse badi samasya ye hae ke aese apradhi log hi hamare qanun banana ke liye baithe hue hae, jo kabhi aesa qanun nahi banayenge jisse ghaplo ko roka ja sake. Ye election ka samay hae; hume utsahit kiya jata hae ke hum vote de. Bharitya matdata ko aese qanun ki mang karni chahiye.

Ek aesa qanun hona chahiye jo niyojit kare ke ek jan pratinidhi ya mantri adhik se adhik kitni sampatti rakh sakta hae. Adhik se adhik daulat chahe wo kisi bhi roop me ho isko maryadit kar diya jana chahiye, jaese ke, kisi bhi roop me do ya panch crore se zyada sampatti nahi rakh sakta ho.

Aese qanun ka dusra praudhan ye hona chaiye ke jis bhi samay kisi bhi jan pratinidhi ya mantri ki sampatti adhiktam tay ki hui sampatti se zyada ho jaye tou usko fauran apne pad se istefa dena hoga. Mere ek dusre blog me maene netao ki niji sampatti ki accounting aur uski ghoshna badi companies ki tarha hi ho aesi baat kahi thi: 'Financial Accounting Be Mandatory for MPs, MLAs'. Aesi halat me hamari rajniti daulat ki nazro se akarshak nahi rah payegi; apradhi log rajiniti me ana band kar denge aur sirf wohi log rajniti me ayenge jike dilo ma jan seva ki sacchi bhavna hogi.

Lekin hamari musibat ye hae ke kayi sare haramzade Bhartiya rajniti me bhare pade hae, jo hamare qanun banne me hissa lete hae, ye kabhi nahi chahenge ke rajniti daulat kamane ki nazar se akarshit na reh jaye. Phir bhi, mae ye kahunga ke janta ke paas ye taqat hae, aur hum kam se kam aesi mang ke sath to is karya ki shuruwat kar sakte hae.

Mae Bharat ke matdata se vinti karta hu ke wo apna qimti mat aese logo ko na de jo inke vichar me aaye se adhik sampatti rakhte ho.

In English: Maximum Assets Limit Upon Indian Politicians

Bhartiya Sansad Aur Vidhan Sabhao me Naujawan

Agar hum Bhartiya Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhao ko dhyan se dekhe to hum ye keh sakte hae ke Bhartiya Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhaye buddho se bhari hui hae. Aesa lagta hae ke agar aap 75 warsh ke niche hae to aap Bhartiya Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhao me bachche hae. Ye ek dharna ban chuki hae ke pratinidhitwa aur mantripad sirf un logo ke liye hota hae jo 75 warsh ke upar hae.

Bharat ke Shasanik vibhag (Executive) me retirement 55-60 saal ki umr me hota hae, jiska matlab ye hae ke karmchari ki upyogita is umr ke baad khatm ho jati hae.  Ye bhi samajh liya jata hae ke karmchari bimariyo se bhi pareshan hoga, jiski waja se wo adhik upyogi nahi reh payega. Aesa koi qanun nahi hae, lekin yehi mana jata hae. Ek aur wajah ye bhi hoti hae ke naujawano ko bhi mauqa diya ja sake. Bhartiya Adalate bhi isi niyam par chalti hae.

Upar ke dono paragraphs ko amne samne rakha jaye to yehi pata chalta hae ke dono baate ek dusre ke bilkul ulat hae, ek taraf Bhartiya Nyayalay aur Executive aur dusri taraf Sansand aur Vidhan Sahaye. Isse ye sabit ho jata hae ke Bharat ke naujawano ka pratinidhitwa naujawan nahi kar rahe hae. Agar aurto ka pratinidhitwa sirf aurte hi kar sakti hae, dalito ka pratinidhitwa sirf dalit hi kar sakte hae, anglo-indian ka pratinidhitwa sirf anglo Indian hi kar sakte hae, fir, naujawano ka pratinodhitwa sattar assi saal ke log kyu karte hae, jinke saath inka umr me bhi boht antar hota hae?

Bharat ki Jansankhya ki banawat se tay hae ke Bharat ke adhiktar log naujawan hae, par kya naujawan log Bharat ke Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhao me apni jansankhya ke hisab se barabar dikhayi dete hae? Naujawan hi Bharat ka asal chehra hae, naye daur ke hisab se inke apni samasyaye hae. Naujawan hi badalte hue Bharat ki taswir hae. Naujawan biite hue kal aur aane wale kal ke bich ek pul ki tarha hae. Inki samasyaye inki soch inki raai sahi tariqe se naujawan hi samajh sakte hae.

Isi liye Bharat ke Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhao me Naujawano ko unki jansankhya ke hisab se nirwachit hone ka mauqa milna chahiye. Naujawano ki sankhya Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhao me badhayi jaaye aur sattar aur assi warsh se adhik aayu wale sansado ki sankhya kam ki jaaye. Bharat ka Sanvidhan Saansad hone ki umr kam se kam pacchis saal batata hae, Sanvidhan ko banane wale hamare rashtriya netao ne ek gatisheel gantantra ka sapna dekha tha, rudhiwaadi, bimar aur thake hue gantantra ka sapna nahi dekha tha!

Mae ye samajhta hu ke pratinidhitwa karna aur mantripad sambhalna both bada aur zimmedari wala kaam hae, jo ke aksar naujawan sahi tarike se nahi kar payenge kyuke inke paas shasan karne ka kattar anubhao nahi hota hae. Mae ye bhi samajhta hu ke sattar aur assi se adhik umar ke saansad diwar me jade hue stambh ki tarha hote hae jo diwar ko mazbuti dete hae, par aesi diwar ki kalpana karna jo sirf stambh se bani ho aur inte lagi hi na ho pagalpan hoga, both sari into ki zarurat padti hae stambho ke bich, Naujwan hi inte hoti hae!

Naujwano ke paas gatishilta aur akansha hoti hae, par videshi taqate inko apni chaalo me asaani se phansa sakti hae, ye hamare naujawan saansado ko Bharat ke khilaf hi shatranj ke mohro ki tarha istemal kar sakte hae. Isi waja se mae yehi kahunga ke sirf taiyyar kiye gaye naujawano ko jo shasan ki kattar padditi ko samajh sake inhi naujawano ko Bharat ke Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhao me nirwachit kiya jaaye, aese naujwano ko na bheja jaye jo jawani ke prabhao me sirf apni niji khwahisho ke liye hi jiite hae.

Isi liye, Mae chahta hu ke jo naujawan IAS ki pariksha paas kar chuke ho lekin IAS ke liye chune na gaye ho, aese logo ko chunao ke liye ticket diya jana chahiye, jo ke aage chal kar Sansad me Lok Sabha me baith sake. Isi tarha se pradesho ki civil services ki parikshao me jo paas ho chuke ho lekin chune na gaye ho in logo ko vidhan sabhao ke chunao ke liye ticket diye jane chahiye, sath hi aese hi logo ko Sansad ki Rajya Sabha me bheja jana chahiye. Is niti ko tab tak lagu rakha jaye jab tak ke hamara Sansad aur hamari Vidhan Sabhaye hamare desh aur pradesho ki jansankhya ki banawat ka ek chota sa magar sahi roop na ban jaye.

Mujhe ye bhi lagta hae, ke dusre aarakhshan bhi Sansad Aur Vidhan Sabhao me hone chahiye, jansankiya banawat ke hisab se (Nar-Naari), (Dehati-Shahri), (Prathmik, Madhyamik, Trutiya shreni ke mazdur), (Niryatak-Aayatak), (Doctorate dharak) aadi. Bhartiya Nirwachan aayog ko iska vishleshan karna chahiye ke kitni seato ko aarakshit kiya jaye doctoro, Engineero, wakilo, mazduro, shikshako, kisano, vaegyaniko, retired raksha/police/nyayala ke logo, machero, aayatak, niryatak, adivasi, (bachcho/jangalo/ janwaro/ pradushan aur anya vishayo) par kam karne wale samajik karya kartao, itihaskaro, vastukaro, khiladiyo (Olympic aur aadi medallist) ke liye.

Bharat dharm nirpeksh rashtra hae, is liye saral dharmik arakshan sahi nahi hoga, saath iske ghalat parinam honge, isi liye dusre kisi aur tariqe se dharmik banawat ke pratinidhitwa ko samyojit kiya jana chahiye.

Jab Bharat ka Sansad aur Vidhan Sabhaye hamari jansankhya ka chhota sa roop ban jayengi tab hum sahi dhang se ek kamiyab, sahi aur fal dene wale jantantra ko pa sakenge. Bharat ke Sansad me naujawano ka arakshan hi hamare sapne ki taraf ek niu ka patthar saabit hoga.

In English: Youths ln Indian Parliament And Assemblies

Time Bound Judiciary, India’s Need!

India has an independent judiciary with Supreme Court of India at its apex. Supreme Court of India is also responsible for interpreting the Constitution of India. Any law passed by the Parliament of India or by any state legislature can be considered unconstitutional if Supreme Court of India considers it going against the basic structure of Constitution of India, again, it is Supreme Court of India which decides what the basic structure of the Constitution of India is. Such is the power of our judiciary.

Indians look to judiciary as a solace against governments, many of which had taken unconstitutional stands from time to time; it was our judiciary which bought relief to us. Judiciary in India is responsible for dispensing justice to one and all against any injustice done to them.

But 120 crore Indians are well aware of the speed of judiciary in India, it in many cases had crossed the normal human life span, we can never call such a scenario as a proper judicial system. A person filing case against any wrong done to him, a person involved in relieving oneself from any accusation in which the person is not involved; people involved in numerous cases ranging from family matters to terrorism all have one thing in common, they have to wait, till when, we don’t know

Any judicial procedure which crosses normal human lifespan is meaningless. A person involved in any case which took 30 years, 25 years, 20 years, would we call it justice? A senior person aged 60 years, 70 years, 80 years would have to think whether to file a case which will take 20, 30 more years or better to accept any wrong done to him because normally that person is not left with 20, 30 more years to live, considering the normal human life span! 

We must at earliest, put a time boundary on all sections of any acts which are in continuity or which would come up in future. For example, all sections of Indian Penal Code should be consolidated with proper time frame; that is, say section 420 dealing with cheating be consolidated with maximum two years, 376 dealing with Rape be consolidated with maximum three years, 302 dealing with murder be consolidated with maximum five years and so on. Even, the same should be done with acts relating with inheritance, compensation rights, consumer rights etc.

Any law which doesn’t include time boundary in its sections and clause should be considered un-constitutional. Our Judicial machinery is three tier, lower courts then to High Courts and then finally to Supreme Court. The time frame talked about should cover all three phases; as an example, in five years even Supreme Court’s hearing for a case involving IPC section 302 be completed.

I appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India to ask the Parliament of India to legislate an act which proposes to bring all acts current and future ones to be consolidated with time frame in their various sections.

Please vote on the page to show you support the cause! 

In Hindi: Samay Simit Nyaay Pranaali, Bharat Ki Zarurat!

Part 1: India needs ‘Fast Track Judiciary’ and not ‘Fast Track Courts’

Samay Simit Nyaay Pranaali, Bharat Ki Zarurat!

Bharat ki nyaay pranaali ek swatantra nyaay parnaali hae, jiske uchyatam sthaan par Bharat ka Sarwochyam Nyaayaalay sthaapit hae. Bharat ke Swanwidhaan ki Vyakhya karne ki zimmedaari bhi Bharat ke Sarwochyam Nyaayaalay ke paas hi hae. Bharat me Sarwochyam Nyaayaalay ke paas Sansad ya kisi bhi Vidhan sabha dwaara banaye kisi bhi qaanun ko awaed ghoshit karne ka adhikar hae, yadi Sarwochyam nyaayaalay ose Bharat ke Sanwidhaan ke bunyadi dhaanche ke viprit maane, iske baad bhi, Bharat ke swanwidhaan ka bunyaadi dhaanche kya hae, isko bhi tay karne ka adhikaar Sarwochyam Nyaayaalay ka hi hae. Ye hae hamaare nyaay pranaali ki shakti.

Bharat ke logou ka wibhinn sarkaro ke khilaaf, jin sarkaaro ne kayi baar aswanvidhaanik kaary kiye the, aakhri samaadhan nyaay pranaali hi rahaa hae; hamare nyaay pranaali ne hi hamesha hume sharan di hae. Bharat ki nyaay pranaali ki zimmedaari hae ke har ek, jiske bhi saath ghalat hua ho ose nyaay de.

Lekin 120 crore Bhartiya achi tarha se jaan te hae ke Bharat me Nyaaytantra ki gati kitni dhimi hae, kayi baar tou iski dhimi gati saamanya manushyo ke jiwan kaal ko bhi paar kar jaati hae, is haalat ko hum sampurna nyaay pranaali tou nahi keh sakte hae naa! Ek vyakti khud ke saath hue anyaay ke khilaaf ek maamla daair karta hae, ek vyakti khud ko nirdosh saabit karne me laga hua hae us apraadh ke aaroop me jisme wo shaamil hi nahi tha; log uljhe huwe hae gharelou maamlou se lekar aatankwaad ke maamlou tak, sab hi ke maamlou me ek chiz tou samaan hae, wo ye ke unhe intezaar karna hae, kitna intezaar, koi nahi jaanta!

Koi bhi Nyaay pranaali jo manushya ke saamanya jiwan kaal ko hi paar kar jaaye bey maaine hokar reh jaata hae. Ek vyakti jo kisi maamle me uljha hua hae jisme 30 saal, 25 saal, 20 saal lag jaaye, kya hum ose nyaay keh sakte hae? Ek varisht naagrik jiski umar 60 saal, 70 saal, 80 saal ho kya wo soch sakta hae ke wo koi maamla nyaayaalay me daair kare, jisme agle 20, 30 saal lag jayenge, ose tou yahi lagega ke isse tou acha hi hoga ke wo anyaay seh kar khamosh baith jaaye kyuke uske paas nyaay ke liye ladne me lagne waale 20, 30 saal tou uske paas bache hi nahi hae!

Hume ise aapaatkaalin zarurat maan kar, jaldi se jaldi hamare saare vartaman qanuun ke saare niyam, adhiniyam, hisse, qalam ko samay sima baandhniya kar de, aur pravadhan kare taake bhavishya ke qaanun bhi samay sima bandhan ke saath banaaye jaaye. Udaahran ke taur par, Bhartiya Dandniya Samhita ko samay baadhniya banaa diya jaaye, dafa 420 jo dhoke baazi se judi hui hae os par 2 saal ki samay baadhyata laga di jaaye, dafa 376 jo balaatkaar se judi hae os par 3 saal ki samay baadhyata lagaayi jaaye, dafa 302 jo hatya se judi hae us par 5 saal ke samay baadhyata laga di jaaye. Aesaahi jaaidaad, muaawaza, upbhogta ke sambandhit adhikaaro ke qaanun me bhi samay baandhniyata jodi jaaye.

Koi bhi Qaanun jisme samay baandhniyata naa ho ose aswanwidhaanik maana jaaye. Hamari nyaay pranaali tiin shreni ki bani hui hae, nichli adaalate, uch nyaayaalay aur aakhir me sarwochyam nyaayaalay. Samay bandhniyata aesi ho ke in tino shreni se maamla guzarne me utna hi samay lage, udaahran, paanch saalo me 302 ke hatya ke maamle sarwochyam nyaayaalay tak pohoch kar pore ho jaaye.

Mae, Bharat ke Maananiya Sarwochyam Nyaayaalay se prarthna karta hu ke wo Sansad se kahe ke aesa pravidhan laaye jiske antargat Bharat ke saare vartaman qaanun aur bhavishya me laaye jaane wale qaanun samay sima bhaadhya banaye jaaye.

Krupya karke is page par apna mat dekar sahyog kariye.

Angrezi me: Time Bound Judiciary, India’s Need!

Part 1: Bharat ki zarurat ‘fast track nyaay’ hae naaki ‘fast track adalat’

Death Sentences should be abolished in India

In India, if anyone commits murder and if the person’s case is found to be rarest of rare case, then that person is given death sentence. On what basis the case is said to be rarest of rare case is ambiguous. On the basis of supplied evidences the judges decide the case to be rarest of rare.

Doesn’t humanity, our constitution and our conscience considers all humans equal? It is absurd if anyone kills other person in rarest of rare manner and rarest of rare circumstances then that person deserves death, implies, if anyone kills another person in normal manner under normal circumstances the accused will get only life sentence, are we trying to say that life taken under normal manner under normal circumstances are not so grievous as those taken under rare manner and circumstances?

Even after death sentence, there is provision for mercy plea, curative plea etc, wherein even after death being pronounced on two persons for killing in rarest of rare manner, one can get life and other will get death, this is absurd! A murderer’s health and old age comes as barrier to death sentence being carried out, implies if only a young person kills in rare manner that person deserves death while those who also kill in rare manner in old age don’t deserve death. Does being killed by women is less a loss than being killed by men? It is absurd that our law considers all such things.

In mercy petition too, when mercy petition is sole prerogative of just and just President, the president takes advises from ruling government, which is definitely a political party with a vote bank politics, it will definitely ask death for its opponents of anyone guilty, why do we involve political party in death sentences’ mercy plea, I know its government but that is very much made up of political party?

India, with its political scenario should abolish death sentence. Many countries with abolished death sentences have lesser murder rates. In India many a time people kill because of injustice been done to them, as manipulating evidences is quiet easy and widespread in India, justice is very slow. Also, deterrent theory is a folly, it is making a scapegoat of someone to prevent others from crime this theory is archaic.

We should rather lubricate our judicial procedure, takes steps against bribery, stop communalism by political parties, improve judicial systems; safeguard religious, cultural identities of one and all, stop imposition of particular religion, culture and language of non ardent, makes filing of FIRs and Cases easier; and abolish death sentence and uphold life imprisonment.

Political parties and media in India has become sadist they enjoy death sentences they publish how painful is death, what is weight of hanging ropes, how a hangman pulls the lever and so on to either consolidate vote bank or get cheap TRPs. 

In Hindi: Bharat me mrityudand ko khatm kiya jaaye  

Bharat me mrityudand ko khatm kiya jaaye

Bharat me, yadi koi vyakti kisi dusre vyakti ki hatya karta hae, aur atyant asaadhaaran paristhiti me karta hae tou ose mrityudand diya jaata hae. Atyant asaadharan sthiti ka pata kaese chale ga ye baat abhi tak aspasht hae. Sabuto ke aadhar par nyaydhish tay karte hae ke asaadhaaran sthti thi ya nahi.

Kya Maanauta, hamara sanvidhan aur hamari buddhi har manushya ko samaan nahi maanti? Ye badi betuki baat ho jati hae ke agar koi vyakti kisi dusre ko atyant asaadhaaran paristhiti me maare tou ose marityudand milega, iska matlab, ke agar koi kisi ko saadhaaran paristhiti me maare to ose aajivan kaarawaas milega. kya hum ye kehna nahi chah rahe hae ke saamaan paristhiti me kisi ka jivan khatam kar dena utna bura nahi hota jitna ke asaadhaaran parsithiti me khatam karna hota hae?

Mrityudand ke baad bhi, hamaare yeha daya yaachika, rog niwarak yaachika ka paravidhaan hae, jisme yadi do vyaktiyou ne atyant asaadhaaran paristhitio me hatyaaye ki bhi hae, tab bhi, ek ko aajivan kaaraawaas mil sakta hae parantu dusre ka mrityudand badla nahi jaata, ye betuki baat nahi hae? Hatyaare ka swaasth uski badhti hui umar uske mrityudand ke aade aati hae, iska matlab agar koi yuwa kisi ki atyant asaadharan sthti me hatya kare tou ose mrityudand milna aawashyak hae parantu koi budhha hatya kare to ose mrityudand nahi hona chaahiye. Kya naari ke hatho mrityu ho jaana chhoti si baat hae aur mard ke hatho mrityu ho jaana badi baat hae? kitni betuki baat hae ke hamara qanun ye sab dekhta hae.

Daya yaachika me bhi, yadi daya yachika sirf aur sirf Rashtrapati ka kaam hota hae, to usme fir rastrapati sarkaar se ray kyu lete hae? Sarkaar ant me tou ek raajinitik dal hi hota hae jiski ek apni vote bank hoti hae, fir tou sarkaar apne raajnitik virodhi doshi ke liye mrityudand ka hi sujhaao karegi na. Hum raajnitik dalou ko daya yaachika me kyu shaamil karte hae? Mae jaanta hu ke wo Sarkaar hae, rajnitik dal nahi, par sarkaare raajtik dalou se hi banti hae.

Bharat me iske raajnitik parik-vashya ko dekhte hue yeha se mrityudand khatam kar dena chaahiye. Boht saare deshou me mrityudand ko khatm hi kar diya gaya hae, aur waha jaghanya apraadho ke aakde bhi Bharat se kam hae. Bharat me aksar tou log is liye bhi hatya karte hae kyuke unke saath anyaay hua hota hae, sabuto aur gawaaho ke saath ched chaad Bharat me ek aam baat hae, nyaay atyant dhimagati se praapt hota hae. Kisi ko dand dena taake dusre dar kar apraadh naa kare ye ek betuki baat hae, ye tou kisi ek vyakti ko is liye bali ka barka bana dena hae taake dusre apraadh na kare, ye sab soch puraani mansikta hae.

Hume iske ulat, hamare desh ki nyaay pranaali ko tez karna hoga, hume rishwatkhori ke khilaaf qadam uthaane honge, hume raajnitik dalo dwara sampradaayikta ko khtam karna hoga; hume alp-sankhyak dharm aur sanskruti ki raksha karni hogi. Kisi par bhi kisi dusre dharm, sanskruti ya bhaasha ko thopne se bachna hoga, police shikayat aur nyaay yaachika ko saral banana hoga; aur mrityudand ko khatm karke aajivan kaarawaas ka pravadhan lana hoga. Bharat ke raajnitik dal aur media atyant hi sadist (pidan kaamuk/ kisi ki pida se adand uthana) ho chuki hae, mrityudand se inhe kitne aanand ka aabhaas hone laga hae, we kya kya prakaashit karte hae, ke mrityu kaese hoti hae, rassio ka bhaar kitna hota hae, jallaad faansi kaese deta hae ityaadi, sirf is liye taake vote bank ki raajniti ki jaa sake ya sasti TRP praapt ki jaa sake.

Angrezi me: Death Sentences should be abolished in India  

Sincere Homage: Dr APJ Abdul Kalam

I pay my sincere homage to the People's President, former President of the Republic of India, a scientist, a teacher, an innovator and a man with great visions for India and the World. Who knows when will India get its next Dr. Kalam, till then, he's left a vacant place. You'll be remembered all the time. RIP Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam. Inna Lillahe Wa Inna Ilaehe Raajiuun!

Meri Shradhaanjali Logou ke Rashtrapati ko, Bharat Ganrajya ke bhuutpurwa Rashtrapati, ek vaigyanik, ek shikhshak, nau nirman kari, ek vyakti jinke paas badi mahatwa kanshaye thi Bharat aur Dunya ke liye. Na jane ab Bharat ko kab uska dusra Dr Kalam milega, us samay tak unki jaga khali hi rahegi. Aap har baar yaad kiye jaoge, Dr APJ Abdul Kalam. Inna Lillahe Wa Inna Ilaehe Raajiuun!

Women In Parliament Should Have 50% Seats

Whether Women are 48% or 50% in India, they should have 50% reserved seats. There are a lot of inequality and crime going on in India against women, and it’s not getting controlled.

India suffers Gang Rapes, Rapes, Acid Attacks, Molestations, Domestic Violence, Gender Discrimination, Female Foeticide etc. The only sensitive solution could be had if women are proportionality (proportional according to biology and nature) represented in Parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha), in State Assemblies (in Vidhan Sahba and Vidhan Parishad).

But, same set of women keep on having seats in houses for years and years is what the problem is all about, they are women and yet insensitive towards women.

We are ready for 33% reserved seats with already set parameters. 17% more reservation should be increased to attain a natural proportional figure of Human demography. But, this 17% seat should be such that same woman should not be included in 17% reserved seat for another tenure. Woman who acquired seat from this 17% quota, however, can contest from the 33% quota again and again.

There should never be more than 50% seat for women, because that would be unnatural.

In Hindi: Sansad Me Aurte 50% Honi Chahiye 

 

Sansad Me Aurte 50% Honi Chahiye

Bharat me Aurto ki sankhya chahe 48% ho ya 50%, unhe 50% aarakshan milna chahiye. Aurto ke sath anek prakar ke apraadh aur annaay ho rahe hae, jise qabu me nahi laya jaa paa raha hae.

Bharat Samuhik Balatkar, Balatkar, Tezab ke Hamle, Chherd Chhard, Bhed Bhao, Mahila Bhrunrd Hatya itya adi se junj raha hae. Ek saonwedan shil samadhan yehi ho sakta hae ke aurto ka pratinidhhitwa  unke anupaat (naisargik aur jaiwik anupaat) ke anusar Sansad me ho (Lok Sabha aur Rajya Sabha me), Prantho ki Vidhan Sabhao aur Vidhan Parishado me bhi.

Parantu, kuch hi aurte warsho tak sansad me pratinidhitwa karti rehti hae, wastao me samasya yehi hae, ke ye aurte hokar bhi aurto ke prati saonwedan shil nahi hae.

Ham 33% aarakshan aurto ko diye jane ke liye tayyar hae, iske niyam bhi pehle se hi sthapit kiye ja chuke hae. Lekin yeh 17% aarakshan aesa ho ke jo aurte ek baar is quota se aarakshit ki gayi hae unhe dusri baar is quota se aarakhshit na kiya jaye. Wo aurte jo 17% quota se pehle aarakhit ki jaa chuki ho, agar wo chahe, to dusri baar ke liye baki 33% quota se nirwachit ho sakti ho.

Kisi bhi sthiti me aurte Sansad me 50% se zyada nahi honi chahiye, kyuke ye anaisargik hoga.


In English:  Women In Parliament Should Have 50% Seats  

Congress (UPA) for India, 2014

Youths ln Indian Parliament And Assemblies

When we take an overview of members of Indian Parliament and assemblies, we can conclude that Indian Parliament and Assemblies are full of aged members. It seems if you’re below 75 years you will be treated as a baby in the Parliament and Assemblies. It has become a myth in India that representation and ministry could only be fulfilled by a person above 75 years.

In Executive of India the retirement age is 55-60 years, implies Indian executive assumes that after 50-60 years the person becomes un-productive. The person is assumed to be having medical conditions which could hinder the person from productive output. It is not an official stand although but a de-facto. Another valid reason for it is fair chances to youths could be provided. Indian Judiciary also follows the pattern of Indian Executive.

If the above two paragraphs are compared there appears a shear contradiction in Indian Executive and Indian Judiciary on one side and Indian Legislatures on the other side. Thus, it is evident that Youths in India are not represented by youths. When women could only be represented by women, Dalits could only be represented by Dalits, Anglo-Indians could only be represented by Anglo-Indians; then, why youths in India are represented by seventy and eighty above persons, with whom youths have a large age gap?

Indian demography states that a large portion of Indian population comprise of young people, are youths in Parliament and assemblies equivalent to their proportion in demography? Youth is the face of a country; they have their peculiar problems related to the current time. Youths are the changing face of the country; youths are the bridge between yesterday and tomorrow. Their issues, expressions and opinions could be completely comprehended only by them.

Thus, Indian Parliament and Assemblies should have youth equivalent to their demographic proportion.  Increase the percentage of members who are youth and middle aged and decrease the percentage of above 70s above 80s members from Parliament and Assemblies. Indian Constitution states the legal age of 25 years to be a Member of Parliament, Founding Fathers aspired for a dynamic democracy and never wished for lethargic, ill and conservative democracy!

I completely agree with the fact that to deliver the duty of representation and ministry is very demanding and full of responsibility, which most of time could not be delivered properly and responsibly by a youth who lacks hardcore experience of governance. I also agree to the fact that aged (70 and 80 plus) Members in Parliament act like pillars of a strong wall, but to imagine a wall made up only of pillars and few or no bricks is absurd, a large number of bricks are needed between those pillars. Youths are the Bricks!

Youths have dynamism and aspiration but they could easily be tricked by foreign powers, who could possibly use youths in Indian Parliament as pawns and leverage for their advantages against India. I thus simultaneously want only groomed youths who could match quotient of hardcore governance to flood the Indian Parliament and not youths who are just concerned about private motives due to the influence of youth age.

Therefore, I feel youths who have cleared the IAS exams but where not selected to IAS, they should be given tickets by political parties to contest elections and become members of Parliament in Lok Sabha. Similarly the Youths who cleared State Administrative Services exams but could not find themselves selected, they should be given tickets to run for Assemblies’ elections, these youth should also be sent to Indian Parliament in Rajya Sabha. This policy should be run until our Parliament and Assemblies become true representation and miniature of our demography.

I also feel, other reservations should be made in Indian Parliament and Assemblies to match the demography in terms of (Man-Woman), (Rural-Urban), (Primary/ Secondary/ Tertiary workers), (Exporters/Importers), (Doctorate holders) etc. Election Commission of India should analyse how many seats should be reserved for Doctors, Engineers, Lawyers, Labourers, Teachers, Farmers, Scientists, Ex-Defense persons, Ex-Judicial persons, Fishermen, Tribal, Ex-Police persons, Exporters, Importers, Tourism sector persons, Child activists, Forest-Animal activists, Social activists, Pollution activists, Historians, Architects, Artists, Sports persons’ (Olympic etc medallist).

India is a Secular country thus reservation on grounds of religion in a simplistic manner would show negative repercussions, thus others grounds should be searched for accommodation of religious representations.

When Indian Parliament and Assemblies become true miniature of our demography we will surely become a true democracy. Youth reservation in Indian parliament is true foundation a milestone for such an aspiration.

In Hindi: Bhartiya Sansad Aur Vidhan Sabhao me Naujawan 

 

A plea to Bombay High Court on footpath parking

A plea to Bombay High Court on footpath parking

Hereby, through this post of mine of my blog, I appeal and pray to the Honourable Bombay High Court, Mumbai on behalf of my fellow citizens to view the following corruption and issue an order to the concerned governmental officials over their illegal and inefficient actions.

The issue is illegal parking of vehicles on footpaths in Mumbai.

As elsewhere, footpaths in Mumbai also, are civic amenity provided here by BMC to pedestrians in Mumbai. Footpaths are foremost solution to traffic jams; if footpaths are not there one cannot imagine anything else other than traffic jams. Footpaths provide safety to pedestrians’ lives from possible traffic accidents, thereby, they also give meaning to traffic flow. On pedestrians’ side; footpaths provide safety cover to specifically pregnant ladies, senior citizens, disabled citizens, children, as also to other pedestrians. Even if pedestrians are engrossed in their worries they are safe from possible traffic accidents if they walk on footpath. Such is the importance of footpaths in Mumbai. Footpaths are symbols of decent and mature cities, and benchmark of civilisations.

RTO and Traffic police of Mumbai are the two governing bodies with regards to the said issue. It is an evident fact that most of Mumbai RTO and Mumbai Traffic police officials allow illegal activities in order to get bribe, these officials when not into corruption become inefficient in discharging their duties. Footpaths in Mumbai have fallen victim to their corruption and inefficiency and have become out of sight at some locations while at others they have become extinct.

To get bribes these officials have started to illegally rent footpaths to many millionaires who use it as their car parking in front of their buildings, housing societies and compounds. They usually pay Rs 1000 to Rs 3000 to these officials for a month’s parking on footpath. RTO towing trucks then do not tow these vehicles for illegal parking on footpath nor do they clamp vehicle or charge fines. Even transport organisations pay bribe to these officials who then allow their large transport vehicles ie: tempo and trucks to be parked on footpath.

Mostly, it is not the main road but smaller roads and cross lanes which is used for illegal renting by official so that their corruption could remain out of frequent eyesight, and continue to give them fruits of bribe. It is smaller roads and cross lanes which see more pedestrians as most people live in these lanes and cross roads.

The result of these is that pedestrians start to walk on the road as they find either no open footpath at all or broken access to continuous footpath walking ie: after little walking on footpath they have to frequently go down on roads as cars are parked at various sites on footpath thus continuous walking on footpath becomes impossible. On what basis these car owners and other vehicle owners park their vehicles illegally on footpath, and why their vehicles are not towed or why they are not charged fine, concludes to us just one answer ‘Bribery’.

Pedestrians in Mumbai have given up walking on footpath for the above reasons. They are forced to walk on roads, though roads are not meant for walking, so that officials can make illegal money and millionaire can break and mock the law. These pedestrians include pregnant ladies, senior citizens, disabled people and children as well. Pedestrians on road cause both traffic jam and fatal accidents. Corruptions of Mumbai RTO and Mumbai Traffic police give us wastage of time in traffic jam and loss of lives in accidents. Traffic jam is not just limited to wastage of time, it further leads to air pollution which is both degrading the environment and threatening life through diseases. These officials are making money by killing directly and indirectly Mumbai pedestrians. Alternate viewpoint could deem these officials as murderers.

A social issue which is going on is rehabilitation of slum dwellers on footpaths. If poor slum dwellers have encroached footpath and made slums on it, they have one reason that they don’t have money to purchase or rent up house. But these millionaires who can afford cars are doing same thing the other way, encroaching the footpaths though they are rich. What conscience allows to re-habilitate slum dwellers and hand over freed footpaths to Mumbai RTO and Mumbai Traffic officials so that they can sell lots to millionaire who own cars, Mumbai RTO and Mumbai Traffic Police Department should be asked of.

Housing societies have appeared as third menace to footpath encroachment, they make several alterations on footpath by tiling it with granite or erecting iron bars with chain and then proudly claim ownership to their adjacent footpaths. Another modes operandi is they hire well built watchmen who look after their illegally claimed footpath. Some millionaires the car owners have also applied locks to the chains making a cage like arrangement on footpaths.

Any argument made by pedestrian results in assault either by well built watchmen who the housing societies hire for this very purpose or with the illegal owner of that lot on footpath. These assaults are most of time bloody, this again raise the issue of law and order. I pray to the Honourable Bombay High Court, Mumbai to order all housing societies to submit a report about status of their adjacent footpaths to RTO and Traffic Police Department, along with other annual reports they submit to other departments.

I also bring to the notice of Honourable Bombay High Court, Mumbai that these actions of Mumbai RTO and Mumbai Traffic Police make a negative image of Mumbai in front of the world, as foreigners and ambassadors do notice this situation. Thus, this is validates us to assume that other countries would be looking to India as a rudiment country under corruption and maladministration right on the street level.

I thus pray, on behalf of my fellow citizens to the Bombay High Court, Mumbai to kindly seek a report from RTO Mumbai and Mumbai Traffic Police department on this issue, and issue an order to Mumbai Traffic Police Department and RTO Mumbai to make their officers abide by the law and bring an end to these illegal activities, also take strict actions against officials involved in this. I also pray to Bombay High Court to commute to legislature to legislate and make it mandatory for housing societies to submit a status report for their adjacent footpath to RTO and Traffic Police Department.

Through this prayer and appeal, I also like to seek the kind attention of Honourable Supreme Court of India to order all Honourable High Courts to take this matter for consideration and issue verdicts and seek reports from related governmental organisations of various cities, as this issue is also seen in other cities and towns of India.

The stupidity of intra-city long bridges

We have been trying to combat traffic jams but are a failure, which implies our methods to control the traffic are absurd. Thus we need to reconsider the problem plus solution to arrive at an efficient traffic system.

Our road development authorities and their so called the highly skilled planners and engineers are just highly paid planners and engineer, but are just opposite in their output to the country. In result we see traffic jam causing air pollution, sound pollution, time wastage, wastage of resources, and absurd infra-structure.

Our cities have two types of road, the longer roads and shorter roads. Longer roads are somewhat similar to spinal cord, while the shorter roads intersecting them resemble ribs. Longer roads are obviously used for longer journeys. While, the shorter roads are for to and fro within the city.

Our idiot planners and idiot engineers propose and erect magnificent long bridges and claim to control the traffic but within weeks people come to know that long bridges the fly-overs have done little for the traffic jams. Our idiot planners and engineers are more interested in foreign study tours than in solving our specific problems.

Magnificent bridges built to fill the vacuum in field of architecture in city is a wrong remedy, for architecture there are many other avenues to upgrade our city, leave the bridges, they are meant to control traffic jams, and provide efficient traffic system and if they can’t whole motive is a failure. Our idiot planners and idiot engineers are more interested in erecting magnificent structure, no matter even if they are ineffective.

It is a fact that the intra-city traffic the to and fro within the city is the source of traffic jam and not the traffic which is towards longer distance. The to and fro traffic and long journey traffic when they come face to face at intersection, that is the obvious source of traffic jam.

When our idiot planners and idiot engineers erect long fly-over they divert the long journey traffic from road to fly-overs, but these idiot don’t know that intra-city to and fro traffic also takes the long road within the city. Such traffic won’t take fly-over as they are intra-city traffic. It is also obvious that the intra-city traffic on long roads below fly-over and intra-city traffic on shorter roads intersecting long roads would however meet at intersections, and would cause traffic jam. Note, what solution has long fly-overs bought? Traffic Jam is as usual! This is the case of wrong remedy.

Our idiot planners and idiot engineers fail to combat intra-city traffic with their absurd plans and structures. Our cities need several or a series of shorter bridges on intersection rather than one long fly-over. The problem is where long road traffic meets the short road traffic at intersection. If short bridges are made on rib roads all the short road traffic will take bridges and long road traffic will be free without hindrance as there will be no or minimal intersection. The vehicles on short roads which are going towards long road would simply go from side of short bridges and merge with long road traffic.

Long bridges are not meant for cities, they are made to connect different points having large distance causing inconvenience due to their natural positions. Like mouth of a bay needs such structure, longer bridges. Cities become disgusting with lots of long bridges inside them.

Displaying architectural skills and making efficient system for traffic are two different things. We don’t need traffic jamming long flyovers displaying our engineering skills; we need shorter bridges which make our traffic flow efficient. I propose all road authorities to consider and ask our idiot planners and idiot engineers to stop being just architecture but become efficient in terms of their outputs. Minor level tests can verify the proposal.

Feel free to write me on my e-mail.

Mazher مظهر: Indian Republic Day Parade and its expenses

Mazher مظهر: Indian Republic Day Parade and its expenses: If we Indians says anything against costly Republic day Parade, in which a hefty amount is burdened on public, we are labelled as insensit...

Mazher مظهر: Gantantra Diwas Ki Parade aur uska Kharch

Mazher مظهر: Gantantra Diwas Ki Parade aur uska Kharch: Gantantra Diwas ki Parade aur uska Kharch Agar hum Bharatiya Gantantra diwas ki parade ke viprit kuch bhi kehte hae, jisme achi khasi ra...

India needs ‘Fast Track Judiciary’ and not ‘Fast Track Courts’

We innovated in judicial system and bought special fast track courts, which deliver their judgments within two, three years. Our conventional courts run the matter and deliver the judgments in decades. High profile cases stay pending for decades if not years, judgment coming after twenty years is assumed to be an early judgment. Ten year’s legal fight is normal.

All these necessitated in creation of fast track courts, as said they deliver their judgments in time frame of two, three years. Lets analyze our this creations in light of the Constitution of India; our Constitution talk about ‘no discrimination on various grounds’. Would not sanity consider the very creation of fast track courts as discriminating? Because, when we already had a system, on which guidance of our Constitution do we give special time frame to particular courts, while we leave other courts in judicial traffic jam? Are not we discriminating?

What was a much better legal solution was rather than creating some fast track courts we should have worked for speeding up our complete judicial system. It would had really given meaning to justice if our judicial system had accelerated. Overall growth of a tree makes it look appealing rather than few shoots showing growth while whole tree shows sign of dormancy.

We need our whole judicial system to become fast track, rather than few fast track courts. Every court should become fast track court. Every section of our legal codes should also have time frame of days, month and years within which their corresponding judgments should be met. Else it’s just some branches showing growth on a dormant tree, Honorable Supreme Court of India should look into this aspect.

In Hindi: Bharat ki zarurat ‘fast track nyaay’ hae naaki ‘fast track adalat’  

Part 2:  Time Bound Judiciary, India’s Need!

Bharat ki zarurat ‘fast track nyaay’ hae naaki ‘fast track adalat’

Humne nyayprakriya me kranti laakar kuch khaas fast track adalato ki sthapna ki, jo apne faesle do ya teen saalo me dete hae. Jabke hamari aam adalato me maamle dashako tak chalte hae tab kahi faesle aate hae. Bade bade maamle dashako tak latke rehte hae agar saalo ki baat na ki jaye to, biis saalo baad faesla aana koi achamba nahi hae, balke oose jaldi aaya hua faesla mana jata hae. Das saalo ki qanuni ladayi bilkul aam baat hae.

In sab wajah ke tehet hume fast track adalato ki sthapna karni padi, jaise ke sab ko pata hae ke ye adalate do ya tiin salo me faesla sunati hae. Chalo inki sthapna ko Bharat ke sanwidhan ki rauwshni me dekha jaaye; hamara sanwidhan vibhinn prakaro ke bhedbhaao se rokta hae. Kya aqalmandi fast track adalato ki sthapna ko bhedbhao nahi manegi? Kyuke hamare paas pehle se hi prakriya maujood thi, Sanwidhan ke kis nirdesh anusar humne kuch hi adalato par faesla sunane ke liye samay sima niyamit ki, jabke humne baaki adalato ko adalati traffic jam me rehne diya hae? Kya ye bhedbhao nahi hae?

Samasya ka behtar qanuni hal to ye hota ke kuch hi fast track court banane se acha tha ke hum kuch aese pravidhan laate jinse puri ki puri kanuni prakriya me hi tezi laayi jaa sake. Us se nyaay ka asal matlab ujagar hota agar hamari puri adalati pranali me tezi laayi jaati. Kisi ped ki puri ki puri pragati oose khubsurat aur aakarshak banaati hae naaki kuch daliya haribhari ho aur pura ka pura ped patjhad me dikhayi de raha ho. 

Humari zarurat puri ki puri nyaay pranali puri ki puri adalati pranali kohi fast track bana dena hae, naaki kuch khas fast track court ki sthapna. Har adalat har nyayalay fast track honi chahiye. Har ek qanuni qalam me uspar banaye gaye maamlo par kitne dino, mahino aur saalo me faesla aa jana chahiye ye maryadit aur ghoshit hona chahiye. Warna aesahi hae ke ped ki kuch daliya to haribhari hae jabke pure ped se patjhad ka sandesh aa raha hae. Bharat ke Maanniya Ucchatam Nyaaylaya ko is maamle me vichar karna hoga.

Angrezi me: India needs ‘Fast Track Judiciary’ and not ‘Fast Track Courts’

Part 2: Samay Simit Nyaay Pranaali, Bharat Ki Zarurat!